Hi Hellashot:
Thanks for your comments. It's not a question of the standard being 4 digits plus 4 other characters, it's about recommending an approach that creates unique file names since many people just don't know how and won't ever rename their files. I've spent 10-15 hours with some clients culling through their images because there were 2-3 files with the same name, and usually 2 were the same, but one was different. It is not fun.
All the best,
Andrew
On Sep 14, 2010, at 1:24 AM, hellashot wrote:
>
>
> --- In artshow_photo@yahoogroups.com, Andrew Darlow <ad@...> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks:
> >
> > I just wrote an article on in-camera file naming in the form of an Open Letter for the site Photofocus.com after dealing with this issue for years, and I'm curious how others feel about it:
> >
> > http://photofocus.com/2010/09/13/an-open-letter-to-digital-camera-manufacturers-regarding-camera-file-naming/
>
> The 4 digit file number is to follow the current EXIF standard. If you do not like this, try to get the EXIF standard updated.
>
> Most people I know that use compact digital cameras have their photo files renamed automatically when downloaded through their downloading software, e.g. "Franky's 5th birthday 001.jpg"
>
> I don't really see a problem unless you are shooting over 10,000 photos on a card during one shoot. Let users rename the files as they download it where they are able to easily type in the alpha description like the example I gave.
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
http://artshowphoto.com/support.htm
PLEASE READ....PLEASE TRIM POSTS!!! Keep quoted material short.
Repeat or create accurate subject lines.
If you want to advertise services related to art shows or photography, either in a forum post or on the resource web site, please contact the forum owner for permission.
Resource web site at
http://ArtShowPhoto.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment