> I never tried Xerox. I haven't even seen one here.
Rolf:
I'm surprised, they are a global company and their printers are considered a step up in build
quality from the typical ones we photographers talk about. Of course, that means that they're
heavy and hard to handle. If I bought a printer that weighed in at 80 kilos, I'd need new
furniture too.
> I didn't mean to say the head cost more than a new printer, just that
> the cost was so high that it wasn't motivated to change it.
Yeah, but so many people DO say it. It's the way many in the industry want you to feel.
We're just going to have to make do with what's avaliable until something else comes along. I
suspect it will be a a photo quality color laser printer with less expensive toner cartridges - it
may weigh as much as I do and I'll have to knuckle down and buy a heavy table for it, but if it
solves this endless grief of bad printing hardware, I'd be happy.
Brian Yarvin
Author, Educator, Photographer
http://www.brianyarvin.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment