Glad someone agrees!
I think the 72 comes for SO many books that tell you that in order to make a
photo small enough for the internet it must be no more then 72dpi - of course
that was back when everyone had dial-ups!
500 wide it is - thanks!
Rod
Melotte Photo Imagery
Photography With an Edge
________________________________
From: David Kachel <david@davidkachel.com>
To: artshow_photo@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, January 31, 2011 8:23:52 PM
Subject: Re: [artshow_photo] Re: Facebook pictures issues
>>>
Call me whacky but I encourage people to use my imags as backgrounds. If
someone is going to steal something on Facebook and print it from a 72dpi
image
- they probebly are not going to buy anything anyway. Plus by telling
"friends"
that I don't mind it sends good will and could actually HELP sell an image.
This is called "smart marketing". It costs you nothing and gets your work in
front of more faces.
David Kachel
___________________
Artist-Photographer
Fine B&W Photographs
www.davidkachel.com
david@davidkachel.com
Gallery:
www.reddoorfinephotographs.com
director@reddoorfinephotographs.com
PO Box 1893
Alpine, TX 79831
(432) 386-5787
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
http://artshowphoto.com/support.htm
PLEASE READ....PLEASE TRIM POSTS!!! Keep quoted material short.
Repeat or create accurate subject lines.
If you want to advertise services related to art shows or photography, either in a forum post or on the resource web site, please contact the forum owner for permission.
Resource web site at
http://ArtShowPhoto.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment