> I just looked at the links (well searched the two items anyhow.) Not sure how
> that fits in to what I was trying to say, though I even confuse myself much of
> the time ;-) My admittedly quick glimpse of those sites didn't seem quite what I
> had in mind. There were bios but not much of an explanation of how the photos
> were created or similar embellishment. Perhaps mine isn't the best idea either.
> But I don't like the concept of participating in selling $1 photos, even if I
> sell hundreds of them. BTW, any niche ideas you might have that can't be
> reproduced en masse are welcome.
Michael:
The two agencies I mentioned are known for their high-end sales. Nothing more.
My problem is that while I did want to make those points about film and scanning, I feel that if
I go any deeper in the direction of prices and niches, I'll come off sounding like the bad guy.
Experience tells me that you'll have to come to terms with the rest of the world of modern
stock photography yourself. I've gone where you're going but I don't have the stomach to tell
you what's ahead. It all ends happily enough, but what's in between is tough.
Brian Yarvin
Author, Educator, Photographer
http://www.brianyarvin.com






0 comments:
Post a Comment