Powered by Blogger.
RSS

[artshow_photo] Re: Property ownership issue???

 

I did finally find this from a lawyer:

You own the copyright to any image you have taken and you can use it for pretty much anything that doesn't come under the definition of "commercial purposes", which in general means advertising. For example you can sell the images to a newspaper or magazine for use in editorial content. Editorial content is pretty much Photographer's rights, Photography and the Law, anything that's not advertising. For commercial usage you need a signed release from anyone identifiable in the image, or in some cases for any identifiable private property. You can generally sell your images as art without a release. Of course exactly what constitutes "commercial use" has to be defined by a court, but generally if the use can't be somehow construed as advertising in some form, you're OK.

Signed releases are only required for commercial (trade and advertising) use of photographs. Editorial, news and art usage generally requires no release from the subject, though some publication may requires them "just to be on the safe side.

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
Donate to support the ArtShowPhoto Forum at
http://artshowphoto.com/support.htm

PLEASE READ....PLEASE TRIM POSTS!!! Keep quoted material short.
Repeat or create accurate subject lines.

If you want to advertise services related to art shows or photography, either in a forum post or on the resource web site, please contact the forum owner for permission.

Resource web site at
http://ArtShowPhoto.com 
.

__,_._,___

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

0 comments:

Post a Comment