No that's like shooting using a long lens into someone's bedroom. If it's
public then there is no expectation of privacy. There is also for rare
people a right of publicity. This mainly applies to actors and such and they
have a right to control the use of their image. This doesn't apply to Jane
Smith who appeared in the neighborhood playhouse.
BK
"It is no profit to have learned well, if you neglect to do well."
--*Publilius Syrus*
J Bryan Krämer North Florida, USA
photos at: http://pbase.com/photoburner
blog at: http://www.photoburner.net
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 17:17, Peter <petecoh@verizon.net> wrote:
> Scott,
>
> Does that also apply to folks say dancing at a public bar?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> On Behalf Of Scott Sharick
> Re: [artshow_photo] Property ownership issue???
>
> The only time you can not (other than very specific military and nuclear
> sites) is if you are photographing a person who has a legitimate
> expectation
> of privacy.
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Donate to support the ArtShowPhoto Forum at
> http://artshowphoto.com/support.htm
>
> PLEASE READ....PLEASE TRIM POSTS!!! Keep quoted material short.
> Repeat or create accurate subject lines.
>
> If you want to advertise services related to art shows or photography,
> either in a forum post or on the resource web site, please contact the forum
> owner for permission.
>
> Resource web site at
> http://ArtShowPhoto.com
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
http://artshowphoto.com/support.htm
PLEASE READ....PLEASE TRIM POSTS!!! Keep quoted material short.
Repeat or create accurate subject lines.
If you want to advertise services related to art shows or photography, either in a forum post or on the resource web site, please contact the forum owner for permission.
Resource web site at
http://ArtShowPhoto.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment