Re: [artshow_photo] Re: new website - BUT - what about Authenticity?

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Beutler Frederick <fjb@umich.edu> wrote:

> I do think it's useless, except as a way of describing some photographs.
>
> By the way, I used to do Cibachrome enlargments from Velvia slides. They
> never looked as what I described as "photoshopped."
>
> Fred
>
> Well, I've seen some examples that have unnaturally vivid and saturated
color. Isn't that what you meant by "photoshopped?" If so, then why not
simply say that the photo has "unnaturally vivid and saturated color." I
don't see any advantage in using "photoshopped" "digital" "film" "glossy"
"Zonies" or any such thing as a pejorative.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___

Messages in this topic (31)

Recent Activity:

• New Members 11

Donate to support the ArtShowPhoto Forum at
http://artshowphoto.com/support.htm

PLEASE READ....PLEASE TRIM POSTS!!! Keep quoted material short.
Repeat or create accurate subject lines.

If you want to advertise services related to art shows or photography, either in a forum post or on the resource web site, please contact the forum owner for permission.

Resource web site at
http://ArtShowPhoto.com